Dad, Sadhu Sundar Singh, MACKINTOSH And Melchizedek!
"How can I believe in a God who sends an poor of an Indian or mestizo, or anyone else in the world, straight to hell, only because the person never heard about Jesus or about the history of Jews and Christians?" - was the argument he heard being repeated in the mouth of my father when I was a boy; and such a question, it only stopped when he came to know Jesus by faith, through the simple reading of the New Testament.
Dad was converted and made its synthesis / answer to this question by a dream in which he saw the multitude of unthinkable and unacceptable for religion, welcomed into the kingdom of heaven.
I, however, remained with his question ...
During the years of total absence of spontaneous contact with the Gospel, as I followed the madness, was a true feeling was just for argument, I raised the question of my father when he said an agnostic.
"How can I believe in a God who sends an poor of an Indian or mestizo, or anyone else in the world, straight to hell, only because the person never heard about Jesus or about the history of Jews and Christians?"
When I stopped fighting the Gospel and decided that it was my only way of life, the issue persisted.
In fact I could not credit that the "church" is not willing to send someone somewhere in the world, everyone who had been born in that place would have been born with Hell Identity Card.
I could not me ...
I could not I see that the love of God.
I could not I see it in the way of being of Jesus.
I could not see how a fully human nature mechanism could have meant determining the eternal destiny / eternal of a human being just uninformed.
I could not believe that historical information was the salvation of the world.
I could not believe that Jesus was conditioned to information and the doctrine of information.
I could not believe that would be the good will of the "church" that could save or not the world.
I could not believe that social, economic, cultural, geographical or religious circumstances could care for a God who was God Himself, and not the devotion of Holy Absolute a ruthless group of people.
I could not believe in salvation Regionality that Christianity proposed.
I could not love that "Jesus".
I could not even to admire the "God" whose love so, so pagan.
It had only been a month since I walked in faith and was already distressed by what, for me, was what was most important, for me cost believe that the salvation of God, Jesus Christ, was less comprehensive than Sin Adam.
That's when Dad gave me "The Apostle of the Bleeding Feet," a book about the mystical / Christian, Hindu, and it became celebrated for their way of life and, above all, by free way found Jesus, only he and Jesus. [Sadhu Sundar Singh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia].
Reading the book opened my other simple worlds. For me it was clear that Jesus did not need the goodwill of the "church" to be revealed to anyone who wanted to.
Soon after my father gave me a book of such a Mackintosh, an author of the 18th century, extremante devotional and allegorical in their interpretations, however, full of love for Jesus. He was reading your comment rich in allegories of Genesis I gave front with Melchizedek, King of Salem. Mackintosh was not extensive, but it was intriguing enough, and the mystical vision, comprehensive enough to give me the clue that was in Melchizedek what the crux of the question of God with humanity without formal information of the Gospel was fulfilled. [Http://www.swordsearcher.com/bible-study-library/mackintosh-commentary.html].
It was these two points of diffuse game, but spiritually beautiful and spacious in the love of God who proposed the Melchizedek figure, I started wondering:
"Is not this Melchizedek the priest of God to the world at all times, before there was the faith of Abraham, we now know?"
And more:
"Would not he like that Angel of the Lord, who is the Lord often in its manifestations in the Old Testament?"
Or yet:
"If this Melchizedek was a local king, however, it represented something greater than Abraham, and therefore part of something at what Abraham curve."
Thus, in the late 1973 began my personal journey in the Bible in order to understand the eternal priesthood of Christ; which later came to strengthen itself in many other ways, to the point that, in 1976, I wrote my "sort thesis" the Presbyterian ministry, based on Freedom of God as Savior outside the borders of Israel and the historic faith travels as information even contains genealogy.
It was so sudden I was startled by the realization of the Lamb Slain Before the World Foundation.
Then, after that, the clouds came out ... - and was possessed of endless joy.
After all, Christ is all!
In it, in truth,
Caio Fábio
April 1, 2009
http://www.caiofabio.net/conteudo.asp?codigo=04433
"How can I believe in a God who sends an poor of an Indian or mestizo, or anyone else in the world, straight to hell, only because the person never heard about Jesus or about the history of Jews and Christians?" - was the argument he heard being repeated in the mouth of my father when I was a boy; and such a question, it only stopped when he came to know Jesus by faith, through the simple reading of the New Testament.
Dad was converted and made its synthesis / answer to this question by a dream in which he saw the multitude of unthinkable and unacceptable for religion, welcomed into the kingdom of heaven.
I, however, remained with his question ...
During the years of total absence of spontaneous contact with the Gospel, as I followed the madness, was a true feeling was just for argument, I raised the question of my father when he said an agnostic.
"How can I believe in a God who sends an poor of an Indian or mestizo, or anyone else in the world, straight to hell, only because the person never heard about Jesus or about the history of Jews and Christians?"
When I stopped fighting the Gospel and decided that it was my only way of life, the issue persisted.
In fact I could not credit that the "church" is not willing to send someone somewhere in the world, everyone who had been born in that place would have been born with Hell Identity Card.
I could not me ...
I could not I see that the love of God.
I could not I see it in the way of being of Jesus.
I could not see how a fully human nature mechanism could have meant determining the eternal destiny / eternal of a human being just uninformed.
I could not believe that historical information was the salvation of the world.
I could not believe that Jesus was conditioned to information and the doctrine of information.
I could not believe that would be the good will of the "church" that could save or not the world.
I could not believe that social, economic, cultural, geographical or religious circumstances could care for a God who was God Himself, and not the devotion of Holy Absolute a ruthless group of people.
I could not believe in salvation Regionality that Christianity proposed.
I could not love that "Jesus".
I could not even to admire the "God" whose love so, so pagan.
It had only been a month since I walked in faith and was already distressed by what, for me, was what was most important, for me cost believe that the salvation of God, Jesus Christ, was less comprehensive than Sin Adam.
That's when Dad gave me "The Apostle of the Bleeding Feet," a book about the mystical / Christian, Hindu, and it became celebrated for their way of life and, above all, by free way found Jesus, only he and Jesus. [Sadhu Sundar Singh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia].
Reading the book opened my other simple worlds. For me it was clear that Jesus did not need the goodwill of the "church" to be revealed to anyone who wanted to.
Soon after my father gave me a book of such a Mackintosh, an author of the 18th century, extremante devotional and allegorical in their interpretations, however, full of love for Jesus. He was reading your comment rich in allegories of Genesis I gave front with Melchizedek, King of Salem. Mackintosh was not extensive, but it was intriguing enough, and the mystical vision, comprehensive enough to give me the clue that was in Melchizedek what the crux of the question of God with humanity without formal information of the Gospel was fulfilled. [Http://www.swordsearcher.com/bible-study-library/mackintosh-commentary.html].
It was these two points of diffuse game, but spiritually beautiful and spacious in the love of God who proposed the Melchizedek figure, I started wondering:
"Is not this Melchizedek the priest of God to the world at all times, before there was the faith of Abraham, we now know?"
And more:
"Would not he like that Angel of the Lord, who is the Lord often in its manifestations in the Old Testament?"
Or yet:
"If this Melchizedek was a local king, however, it represented something greater than Abraham, and therefore part of something at what Abraham curve."
Thus, in the late 1973 began my personal journey in the Bible in order to understand the eternal priesthood of Christ; which later came to strengthen itself in many other ways, to the point that, in 1976, I wrote my "sort thesis" the Presbyterian ministry, based on Freedom of God as Savior outside the borders of Israel and the historic faith travels as information even contains genealogy.
It was so sudden I was startled by the realization of the Lamb Slain Before the World Foundation.
Then, after that, the clouds came out ... - and was possessed of endless joy.
After all, Christ is all!
In it, in truth,
Caio Fábio
April 1, 2009
http://www.caiofabio.net/conteudo.asp?codigo=04433
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário